Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Top Gladiators Meet: Club Update, Results for Round Three, Pairings for Fall Swiss

















Joaquin Phoenix, standing next to Russel Crowe, in epic movie, Gladiator

Rd Bd Scr White Scr Black
04 1. ___ Radomskyj, Peter (3.0) ___ Chieu, Kenneth Jos (2.5)
04 2. ___ Norris, Anthony (2.5) ___ Zilbermintz, Lev (2.5)

04 3. ___ Kwok, Man chi (2.0) ___ Boxer, Matthew (2.0)
04 4. ___ Fortunato, Joseph (2.0) ___ Hart, Charles M (2.0)
04 5. ___ Cohen, Bryan Paul (2.0) ___ West, Robert (2.0)
04 6. ___ Palacios,Danny (2.0) ___ Pepe, Mike (1.5)
04 7. ___ Sharpell, Fred (1.5) ___ Katz, Harry S (1.5)
04 8. ___ Pedersen, Roger E (1.0) ___ Trieste, Edward Wi (1.5)

04 9. ___ Martinez, Alberto (1.0) ___ Nikitopoulos, Nicholas (1.0)
04 10. ___ Korn, David Allan (1.0) ___ Garrett, Damon T (1.0)
04 11. ___ Nayak, Mohan Rao (1.0) ___ Levanda, Mark (1.0)
04 12. ___ Burn, Murray (0.0) ___ Lynn, Robert L (0.00

Average rating of top eight: 2056, average next eight: 1812, and last eight ('ex'-1132): 1496. Average of all twenty-five, a whopping 1762. Now that is strong--calculations by dk


Joaquin in his new persona. Some thought him mad; others testing 'the edge'. You decide:

West Orange Chess Club Fall 2011 Swiss Swiss Wall Chart, Round 4
Name/State ID Group/Team Rate Rnd 1 Rnd 2 Rnd 3 Rnd 4

1. Radomskyj, Peter 2272 B 13 W 9 B 6 W 2
NJ 12460475 1.0 2.0 3.0
2. Chieu, Kenneth Jos 2148 HALF W 15 B 10 B 1
NJ 12595190 0.5 1.5 2.5
3. Zilbermintz, Lev 2089 W 14 B 10 W 8 B 5
NJ 12476202 1.0 1.5 2.5
4. Pedersen, Roger E 1951 B 15 W 21 B 18 W 23
NJ 10092990 0.5 1.0 1.0
5. Norris, Anthony 1946 W 16 B 12 HALF W 3
NJ 12758884 1.0 2.0 2.5

6. Boxer, Matthew 1921 B 17 W 11 W 1 B 18
NJ 12510577 1.0 2.0 2.0
7. Hart, Charles M 1919 W 18 B 25 W 19 B 20
NJ 10004071 0.0 1.0 2.0
8. Cohen, Bryan Paul 1900 B 19 W 18 B 3 W 16
NJ 20020149 1.0 2.0 2.0
9. Martinez, Alberto 1890 W 20 B 1 B 21 W 24
NJ 12490535 1.0 1.0 1.0
10. Pepe, Mike 1889 B 22 W 3 W 2 B 21
NJ 12565700 1.0 1.5 1.5
11. Garrett, Damon T 1824 W 23 B 6 W 20 B 19
NJ 12545276 1.0 1.0 1.0
12. Sharpell, Fred 1819 B 24 W 5 B 23 W 15
NJ 12088600 1.0 1.0 1.5
13. Burn, Murray 1814 W 1 B 20 B 15 W 22
NJ 10104891 0.0 0.0 0.0
14. Nayak, Mohan Rao 1758 B 3 W 19 B 22 W 25
NJ 12237580 0.0 0.0 1.0
15. Katz, Harry S 1718 W 4 B 2 W 13 B 12
NJ 12052860 0.5 0.5 1.5
16. West, Robert 1686 B 5 W 22 W 24 B 8
NJ 12904515 0.0 1.0 2.0
17. Rivero, Rene Thoma 1671 W 6 WITHDRAWN
NJ 12441215 0.0 F0.0 0.0 0.0
18. Kwok, Man chi 1607 B 7 B 8 W 4 W 6
NJ 14201547 1.0 1.0 2.0
19. Korn, David Allan 1604 W 8 B 14 B 7 W 11
NJ 14564164 0.0 1.0 1.0
20. Fortunato, Joseph 1550 B 9 W 13 B 11 W 7
NJ 12932570 0.0 1.0 2.0
21. Palacios,Danny 1481 HALF B 4 W 9 W 10
NJ 12801718 0.5 1.0 2.0

22. Lynn, Robert L 1446 W 10 B 16 W 14 B 13
NJ 14010970 0.0 0.0 0.0
23. Trieste, Edward Wi 1385 B 11 W 12 B 4 B 4
NJ 12029830 0.0 X1.0 1.5
24. Nikitopoulos, Nicholas 1325 W 12 BYE B 16 B 9
NJ 14140077 0.0 1.0 1.0
25. Levanda, Mark 1132 HALF W 7 HALF B 14
NJ 12394013 0.5 0.5 1.0


Same Joaquin, After his six month episode... Talk about a striking guy!

2 comments:

John Hagerty said...

The midpoint or median is 1814 which is also indicative of the strength of the field. I personally like to use midpoints for analyzing data since it focuses on the central tendency of the ratings and avoids "skewing" of the observed information.

Anonymous said...

The midpoint or median is 1814 which is also indicative of the strength of the field. I personally like to use midpoints for analyzing data since it focuses on the central tendency of the ratings and avoids "skewing" of the observed information.